FAR · Select balance sheet accounts · 6 practice questions
Equity Method Rollforward: Dividends and Basis Differences
Equity-method income is your share of investee income minus amortization of finite-lived asset basis differences; dividends reduce the investment. Below: a worked rollforward separates income adjustments from cash dividends.
Try one first
Hint
Compute your 25% share of Baker's net income, determine any purchase-price excess and its annual amortization, and remember how dividends affect the investment account under the equity method.
Answer D. Able's 25% share of Baker's net income is $200,000 × 25% = $50,000. The purchase-price excess is $650,000 − (25% × $2,400,000) = $50,000, allocated to depreciable equipment and amortized over 10 years, so annual amortization = $5,000, which reduces equity-method income. Recognized equity-method income = $50,000 − $5,000 = $45,000. Dividends of $60,000 × 25% = $15,000 reduce the investment carrying amount. Ending carrying amount = $650,000 + $45,000 − $15,000 = $680,000.
Why not A: Tempts a candidate who misapplies the amortization period (for example, using a 5-year life instead of the stated 10 years), producing amortization of $10,000 and thus income of $50,000 − $10,000 = $40,000. It fails because the problem specifies a 10-year remaining life, so annual amortization is $5,000, not $10,000.
Why not B: Tempts because it starts with the investor's 25% share of earnings ($50,000) but omits the annual amortization of the purchase-price excess. It fails because the $5,000 amortization must reduce equity-method income (and affect carrying amount); without amortization the ending carrying amount would be $650,000 + $50,000 − $15,000 = $685,000, which is incorrect under the facts given.
Why not C: Tempts a candidate who improperly treats dividends as income in addition to the share of earnings (e.g., 50,000 + 15,000 − 5,000 = 60,000) and also fails to reduce the carrying amount for dividends. It fails because under the equity method dividends reduce the investment carrying amount (not increase income), and the correct amortization must be applied.
Worked example
On January 1, an investor pays $800,000 for 20% of Delta Co. and applies the equity method. The investor's allocated basis difference includes $70,000 for equipment with a seven-year remaining life and $35,000 of goodwill. Delta reports $350,000 of annual net income and pays $150,000 in dividends. Assume straight-line depreciation, no impairment, and no other adjustments. Compute year-end equity-method income and investment carrying amount.
| 1 | Share of investee net income20% × $350,000 | $70,000 |
| 2 | Equipment basis amortization$70,000 ÷ 7 years | $10,000 |
| 3 | Equity-method income$70,000 - $10,000 | $60,000 |
| 4 | Dividends received20% × $150,000 | $30,000 |
| 5 | Ending investment balance$800,000 + $60,000 - $30,000 | $830,000 |
Recognize $60,000 of equity-method income and report the investment at $830,000 at year-end.
Check: The investment rises by $30,000: $60,000 of adjusted income minus $30,000 of dividends, with amortization deducted only once.
Key points
- Multiply an investee-wide fair-value step-up by your ownership percentage before amortizing it.
- If the question gives your allocated basis difference, do not multiply it by ownership again.
- Track each finite-lived asset separately using its remaining useful life.
- Land, goodwill, and indefinite-lived intangibles are not amortized.
How the exam traps you
- Treating dividends as additional equity-method income. Dividends received reduce the investment. They do not increase equity-method income.
- Using your share of reported net income without the basis adjustment. Subtract amortization of finite-lived asset basis differences to calculate equity-method income.
- Amortizing the entire excess purchase price, including goodwill. Allocate the excess by component. Amortize finite-lived asset differences, not goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles.
Question 2
Hint
Start by deciding whether the ownership percentage is conclusive. Then determine whether year-end fair value matters once the proper accounting model is selected.
Answer B. Although Harlan owns less than 20% of Mace, the facts (board representation and participation in policy decisions) indicate significant influence, so the equity method applies. Under the equity method, Harlan increases the carrying amount by its share of Mace's net income (18% × $200,000 = $36,000) and decreases it by its share of dividends (18% × $60,000 = $10,800). Carrying amount = $900,000 + $36,000 − $10,800 = $925,200.
Why not A: This treats the 20% threshold as conclusive and applies fair-value-through-net-income treatment; however, the 20% rule is a presumption that can be rebutted and the facts show significant influence. Also, Harlan did not elect the fair value option.
Why not C: This correctly applies the equity method to recognize Harlan's share of earnings (18% × $200,000 = $36,000) but omits the reduction for dividends received. Under the equity method, dividends are generally treated as a return of investment and reduce the carrying amount.
Why not D: This conflates older available-for-sale/OCI concepts with equity-investment accounting. Marketable equity securities are not generally reported through OCI, and more importantly the facts support the equity method because of significant influence.
Question 3
Hint
First determine whether Alder has significant influence; if so, compute carrying amount using equity-method mechanics (cost + share of earnings − dividends).
Answer C. The equity method applies because Alder demonstrates significant influence (board appointment and routine participation) despite owning less than 20% (see ASC 323). Under the equity method the carrying amount = cost + investor's share of investee net income − dividends received: $1,200,000 + (0.18 × $300,000 = $54,000) − $36,000 = $1,218,000. Alder did not elect the fair-value option, so the quoted year‑end market price is not used.
Why not A: Tempts because Birch's shares are actively traded and a year‑end market price is provided, which can suggest mark‑to‑market measurement. It is wrong because Alder did not elect the fair‑value option and the facts indicate significant influence, so ASC 323 requires equity‑method accounting rather than reporting at market.
Why not B: Tempts because it equals cost plus Alder's share of Birch's net income ($1,200,000 + $54,000 = $1,254,000). It is incorrect because under the equity method dividends are a return of investment and reduce the carrying amount; Alder received $36,000 in dividends, which must be subtracted.
Why not D: Tempts because it adds both the investor's share of earnings and the dividends to cost ($1,200,000 + $54,000 + $36,000). It is wrong because dividends are not recognized as additional investment income under the equity method and should decrease the investment balance, not increase it.
Question 4
Hint
Start with acquisition cost, then identify which investee activities increase or decrease an equity-method investment. Also ask whether any portion of the purchase-price differential must be amortized.
Answer D. Under the equity method, start with cost ($500,000), add Ponder's share of Slate's net income (25% × $240,000 = $60,000), subtract Ponder's share of dividends (25% × $80,000 = $20,000), and amortize the investor's share of the excess fair value attributable to equipment (25% × $200,000 = $50,000 amortized over 10 years = $5,000). Carrying amount = $500,000 + $60,000 − $20,000 − $5,000 = $535,000.
Why not A: This equals cost plus Ponder's share of income less dividends (500,000 + 60,000 − 20,000). It omits amortization of the purchaser's share of the excess fair value assigned to depreciable equipment, which must reduce the investment.
Why not B: This equals cost plus Ponder's share of income (500,000 + 60,000) and fails to subtract either dividends or the amortization of the purchase-price differential, so it overstates the investment.
Why not C: This reflects cost plus share of income less amortization (500,000 + 60,000 − 5,000 = 555,000) but ignores that dividends are a return of investment under the equity method and therefore decrease the carrying amount.
Question 5
Hint
Start with the purchase price, then identify which post-acquisition items increase the equity-method investment and which items reduce it.
Answer C. Under the equity method, start with cost of $600,000. Add Pine's 25% share of Sage's net income (0.25 × $160,000 = $40,000), subtract Pine's 25% share of dividends (0.25 × $60,000 = $15,000), and subtract amortization of the excess basis allocated to the building ($50,000 ÷ 10 = $5,000). Ending carrying amount = $600,000 + $40,000 − $15,000 − $5,000 = $620,000.
Why not A: This reflects cost + 25% share of income − amortization ($600,000 + $40,000 − $5,000 = $635,000) but fails to subtract Pine's 25% share of dividends (a reduction of $15,000), so it is incorrect.
Why not B: This equals cost + 25% share of income − 25% share of dividends ($600,000 + $40,000 − $15,000 = $625,000) but omits the $5,000 amortization of the building-related basis difference, so it is incorrect.
Why not D: This is cost + 25% share of income only ($600,000 + $40,000 = $640,000), ignoring both the dividend reduction and the amortization of the building-related excess basis, so it is incorrect.
Question 6
Hint
Perform an equity-method rollforward from cost (add investor's share of investee income; subtract investor's share of dividends) and decide whether any acquisition-date excess is allocated to finite-lived identifiable assets (and thus amortized) or to goodwill.
Answer B. Under the equity method, start with cost $1,140,000. Add Pella's 30% share of Sona's net income (0.30 × $360,000 = $108,000) and subtract Pella's 30% share of dividends (0.30 × $120,000 = $36,000). Also subtract amortization of Pella's share of acquisition-date fair-value increments allocated to finite-lived assets: equipment (0.30 × $300,000 = $90,000 ÷ 10 = $9,000) and customer-related intangible (0.30 × $150,000 = $45,000 ÷ 5 = $9,000), total $18,000. Carrying amount = $1,140,000 + $108,000 - $36,000 - $18,000 = $1,194,000. Residual goodwill is included in the investment and is not amortized.
Why not A: Tempting because it results from (incorrectly) deducting Sona's total dividends of $120,000 instead of Pella's share (30% × $120,000 = $36,000); arithmetic: 1,140,000 +108,000 -120,000 -18,000 = 1,110,000. It's wrong because under the equity method dividends reduce the investor's carrying amount only to the extent received by the investor.
Why not C: Tempting because it reflects amortizing only the equipment increment (9,000) and omitting the intangible amortization (9,000); arithmetic: 1,140,000 +108,000 -36,000 -9,000 = 1,203,000. It's wrong because the investor must amortize its share of all identifiable finite-lived fair-value increments over their remaining lives.
Why not D: Tempting because it applies Pella's share of income and dividends but fails to amortize any basis differences; arithmetic: 1,140,000 +108,000 -36,000 = 1,212,000. It's wrong because acquisition-date excess allocated to finite-lived identifiable assets must be amortized, which reduces equity-method income and the investment balance.
Common questions
How do you calculate an equity-method investment balance?
Beginning balance + your share of investee net income - basis difference amortization - dividends received = ending balance. This assumes no other adjustments.
Do dividends count as equity-method income?
No. Recognize your adjusted share of investee earnings as income; dividends received reduce the investment carrying amount.
Is goodwill amortized under the equity method?
No. Goodwill remains included in the investment carrying amount without amortization; finite-lived asset basis differences are amortized over their remaining useful lives.
Practice FAR like the real exam
The free ChatCPA simulator: real exam layout, timed testlets, starting with a question on this topic. No account needed to start.
Open the free simulator →More on Investments
Questions from the ChatCPA bank of 17,658 CPA exam questions, each with a written reason for every wrong answer. ChatCPA is built by Nicholas Miller, CPA (Oregon #14907). How these pages are made. Spot an error? Tell us.